Patient Safety and Quality

  • 1.  Rhogam versus Rhophyac

    Posted 03-04-2024 14:20

    Does anyone have any experience in using Rhophylac instead of Rhogam specifically the concern that if the BMI is > 30 IM Rhophylac may not be as effective as Rhogam when BMI > 30 ?? If you do would love to know how are you handling this are you doing IV for BMI > 30 ??

    David McLean 



    ------------------------------
    David Mclean
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Rhogam versus Rhophyac

    Posted 03-04-2024 18:11

    Hi David,

    Where does this concern about Rhophylac dosing in obese patients come from?

    The package insert does not mention obesity or BMI. 

    This 2017 article concludes that obesity should not alter RhIG dosing

    Considerations for dosing immunoglobulin in obese patients

    If there is new info, please share the sources. 

    Regards,

    Andy Combs

    PubMed Central (PMC) remove preview
    Considerations for dosing immunoglobulin in obese patients
    Obesity is a very common condition; however, the effect of excess body weight on the appropriate dose of immunoglobulin has not been defined empirically. The proposed pharmacokinetic differences between lean and obese patients and the opportunity to reduce ...
    View this on PubMed Central (PMC) >



    ------------------------------
    Andrew Combs
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Rhogam versus Rhophyac

    Posted 03-05-2024 07:07

    Andy

    Thanks for the response in the product insert downloaded from the website : chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://labeling.cslbehring.com/PI/US/Rhophylac/EN/Rhophylac-Prescribing-Information.pdf



    ------------------------------
    David Mclean
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Rhogam versus Rhophyac

    Posted 03-05-2024 10:16

    Oh, I missed that - I searched the Prescribing Information for "BMI" and "obes" so I did not find the "body mass index" mention.

    This is anecdotal information - "there have been reports" .

    How many reports, how big was BMI, what was time interval from event to dosing, what does "a lack of effect" mean?  Was this in pregnancy-related prophylaxis cases or ITP?

    Theoretically, the concern about BMI and effectiveness would apply equally to Rhogam and Rhophylac.  The section on Post-Marketing surveillance starts with caveats about inability to determine frequency or causal relationship. 

    The statement says "see Dosing and Administration (2.2)" but section 2.2 makes no mention of altering dose or route based on BMI.

    The question is whether a change in practice is warranted by this information.  I suppose giving RhIg IV to obese persons would be a relatively benign modification. But without peer-reviewed evidence, it hardly rises to "standard of care" level.



    ------------------------------
    Andrew Combs
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Rhogam versus Rhophyac

    Posted 03-09-2024 13:02

    Anndy

    Thanks for the feedback our system is switching to Rhophyac due to cost and availability of Rhogam so a lot of debate about what to do with BMi > 30, postpartum the operational change will be easier as the patient are still inpatient post delivery and giving it IV is easily accomplishable. Prenatally it is a different story as the outpatient practices will not give it IV so need to co-ordinate with an infusion center. 

    This issue of the BMI also applies to Rhogam it is just we never knew about it so gave it IM but in reality, it is probably not as "effective" in the over 30 BMI category but whether there is a clinical difference we don't know. 



    ------------------------------
    David Mclean
    ------------------------------